The Trump Administration Wants to Reverse Roundup Verdict, Protecting Bayer and Monsanto

By Phillip Schneider

Bayer AG, which recently acquired the Roundup herbicide in a $63 billion buyout of Monsanto, has once again been found guilty in a California court for not informing customers that their product can cause cancer. The Trump Administration, on the other hand, wants that ruling overturned.

In August of 2018, Monsanto lost their first big lawsuit, alleging that the active ingredient of their Roundup herbicide causes cancer. Dewayne Johnson, a groundskeeper in California, successfully argued that Monsanto had hidden evidence of a link to cancer in past documents and that Roundup was the only possible cause of his non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

The California jury decided that the Monsanto company had acted with “malice” and was ordered to pay $289 million in damages, although the company still has been arguing that glyphosate — the active ingredient in Roundup — “does not cause cancer.”

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Ever since that day, thousands of plaintiffs have began suing Monsanto for causing their non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. One of those plaintiffs is Edwin Hardeman, who was the first to challenge Monsanto in a federal court.

The judge overseeing Edwin’s suit even restricted him from discussing Monsanto’s past, Hardeman’s “personal history”, and information about regulatory decisions, barring him from talking about anything besides whether Roundup caused his cancer. Despite what his attorneys argued was a huge disadvantage, he was still able to get his point across, won the suit against Monsanto, and was awarded $25 million.

Although the evidence that Roundup causes cancer is quite equivocal, there is strong evidence from which a jury could conclude that Monsanto does not particularly care whether its product is in fact giving people cancer, focusing instead on manipulating public opinion and undermining anyone who raises genuine and legitimate concerns about the issue. – Edwin Hardeman

However, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Justice Department want to see that ruling overturned by a higher court, according to a Ninth Circuit court brief filed in December. Bayer’s stock soared immediately thereafter.

Learn how to heal and feel better naturally!
Click Here to Watch the Free Video Series Now

This decision isn’t surprising, seeing as Trump ran his whole campaign on the economy, not environmental or health safety. According to a 2017 Associated Press analysis, almost half of Trump’s EPA appointees have previous industry ties, with about one-third previously working as lawyers or lobbyists for chemical or fossil fuels companies like Monsanto.

Twenty-four ethics waivers were signed by Trump pick Don McGahn, which allowed former industry members to oversee the industries they used to work for. During Obama’s administration, almost seventy of those waivers were signed.

In November, a three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Trump Administration had unlawfully excluded millions of tons of toxic materials from undergoing safety review, including common products such as fire retardant, house paint, and insulation.

The Trump Administration’s argument as to why the Hardeman case should be ignored is that the Trump EPA does not classify glyphosate as a carcinogen, and therefore Bayer and Monsanto have no need to label it as such.

However, a plethora of research shows the opposite. In a recent 2019 meta-analysis, scientists found that glyphosate exposure could raise the risk of developing non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma cancer by as much as 41%.

Overall, in accordance with findings from experimental animal and mechanistic studies, our current meta-analysis of human epidemiological studies suggests a compelling link between exposures to GBHs and increased risk for NHL. – Luoping Zhang, Study Author

Another recent study from Environmental Sciences Europe found that the EPA generally bases their conclusions on studies done by regulatory agencies, while ignoring independent and peer-reviewed studies, “of which 70% were positive” for a glyphosate-cancer link.

EPA’s evaluation was focused on typical, general population dietary exposures assuming legal, food-crop uses, and did not take into account, nor address generally higher occupational exposures and risks. – Charles M. Benbrook, Study Author

It doesn’t appear that the Trump Administration will allow Bayer’s stock to go down without a fight, but I have a feeling that isn’t going to stop victims of Roundup from seeking justice.


Read more articles from Phillip Schneider.

Phillip Schneider is a student as well as a staff writer and assistant editor for Waking Times. If you would like to see more of his work, you can visit his website, or follow him on the free speech social network Minds.

This article (The Trump Administration Wants to Reverse Round-Up Verdict, Protecting Bayer and Monsanto) as originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Phillip Schneider and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.

Like Waking Times on FacebookFollow Waking Times on Twitter.

Subscribe for natural health news to your inbox. Follow Natural Blaze on YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.

Source

New Health Alert Issued For BPA Alternative: BPS “Hinders Heart Function Within Minutes”

By Jason Erickson

We’ve been among those who have reported for years about the horrible effects of BPA exposure, from hormone disruption to obesity, infertility and reproductive disorders in both genders, breast cancer, prostrate cancer, behavioral problems, brain impairment, hypertension and more.

Obviously, alternatives to this dangerous chemical are desperately needed, but we’ve also reported on the negative health effects from BPA’s main replacement: BPS.

Washington State University was one of the first to note how BPS affected one of their lab experiments, raising grave concerns about the generational impact, specifically regarding hormone disruption:

[W]e experimentally tested four common replacement bisphenols and found effects on sperm and egg production in our mice analogous to those that result from BPA exposure.

The possibility that exposure effects may span generations has been a growing concern. Our recent experience with accidental exposure allowed us to ask if BPS exposure effects persisted across generations, and if so, for how long. Our data suggest persistence of effects for up to three generations, with full recovery evident in great-grandsons. (Source)

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Other studies were cited by the Alliance for Natural Health around the same time which stated the following:

Studies have also shown that BPS causes breast cancer cells to aggressively multiply. BPS has also been linked to heart arrhythmia and endocrine disruption, causing puberty at a premature age in females.

Despite this alarming data, nearly 81% of Americans have detectable levels of BPS in their urine. (Source)

However, nothing to date has presented such an imminent call for consumer awareness as this latest study from the University of Guelph that has concluded not only that exposure to BPS can lead to severe health consequences within minutes, but also from first-time exposure.

BPA’s counterpart replacement BPS can hinder heart function within minutes of a single exposure, according to a new University of Guelph study.

The study is the first to show the instant effects bisphenol S (BPS) can have on the heart.

“We expected to find similar effects from BPS as we have with BPA, but not at the speed that it worked,” said biomedical sciences professor Glen Pyle, who conducted the study with former master’s student Melissa Ferguson. “This replacement chemical seems to be more potent.”

Bisphenol A (BPA), a chemical used in plastic products, was banned from baby bottles in Canada in 2010 over concerns that it may leach into foods and cause hormone-related side effects. More manufacturers are now using BPS as a replacement in their products and labelling them as BPA-free.

When mice were given bisphenol BPA or BPS in amounts that mimicked typical human levels, their heart function worsened, especially in females, within minutes of exposure.

These findings are concerning, as endocrine receptors and metabolic pathways are similar in mice and humans, said Pyle.

“This study raises concerns about the safety of BPS as a replacement for BPA.”

It’s particularly worrisome for people with coronary heart disease, high blood pressure, diabetes or obesity, because the effects of BPS could increase the chance of a heart attack or make a heart attack more severe, he added.

“If the heart is in a precarious position, when you add a stressor you can make it worse.”

Published recently in the journal Scientific Reports, the study entailed treating mouse hearts with BPA and BPS at levels typically seen in people. Each chemical on its own was found to depress heart function by dampening heart contractions causing slower blood flow. However, BPS had a quicker impact – within five minutes of exposure.

“Previous research has looked at the chronic effects that can happen when exposed to BPS over days,” said Pyle. “But we are the first to show how fast BPS can work. This is an important finding because it means you don’t need to have a buildup of the chemical over time to experience its harmful effects.”

BPA is found in plastics used for food packaging, including liners for metal cans and other containers, as well as in medical devices such as hospital intravenous lines and dental sealants.

Although the body gets rid of bisphenols quickly, their ubiquitous use in so many consumer goods means that the substance persists.

Pyle advocates banning the substitute chemical BPS from such consumer products as food and beverage packaging, toys and thermal paper receipts. He also suggests consumers reduce plastic use, including single-use plastics. (Source: University of Guelph / Journal Article)


Jason Erickson writes for NaturalBlaze.com. This article (New Health Alert Issued For BPA Alternative: BPS “Hinders Heart Function Within Minutes”) may be republished in part or in full with author attribution and source link.

Subscribe to Natural Blaze for health freedom and natural living headlines to your inbox. Follow Natural Blaze on Twitter and Facebook.

 

Source

Trump Administration Announces Nationwide Ban on Most Flavored Vaping Products

By John Vibes

This week, the Trump administration and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced that flavored vaping products will be banned across the country.

The measure stopped short of banning all vaping products, and as a result there will still be some openings for consumers who are looking for a flavored nicotine option.

Open tank systems, which allow vape users to refill the fluid with whatever type of liquid they wish, will act as a loophole. Consumers will be able to manually fill their tanks with flavored juice.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Menthol vaping products, and those that taste similar to cigarettes, will not be affected by the ban.

In a statement announcing the ban, Alex Azar, HHS secretary, said that the measure was aimed at keeping nicotine products away from children:

By prioritizing enforcement against the products that are most widely used by children, our action today seeks to strike the right public health balance by maintaining e-cigarettes as a potential off-ramp for adults using combustible tobacco while ensuring these products don’t provide an on-ramp to nicotine addiction for our youth.

Still, many vape shop owners and others in the industry are concerned that they won’t be able to last through the current regulatory environment. Many activists in the industry have suggested that this change in policy will only make vaping products more dangerous, by pushing them onto the black market.

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published a report in the midst of the vaping scare, saying that black market products, particularly black market THC cartridges, were behind a large number of the vaping related illnesses that were reported in the news.

A statement from the CDC said:

We do know that THC is present in most of the samples tested by the [Food and Drug Administration] to date, and most patients report a history of using THC-containing products. The latest national and state findings suggest products containing THC, particularly those obtained off the street or from other informal sources (e.g. friends, family members, illicit dealers), are linked to most of the cases and play a major role in the outbreak.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) also eventually agreed that it was black market products that were responsible for the string of illnesses that caused the scare earlier this year.

Despite the evidence that has been discovered since the initial vaping hysteria began, the U.S. government has still gone forward with banning products that have been shown to play no significant role, if any, in the recent deaths.

In fact, the evidence has shown that bans such as the one to pass this week are what make this kind of product more dangerous.


By John Vibes | Creative Commons | TheMindUnleashed.com

Subscribe for natural health news to your inbox. Follow Natural Blaze on YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.

Source

Roundup® & Glyphosate Exposed For What They Are: Toxic, Disease-causing Chemicals

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Even though Monsanto has been ‘taken down’ via a buy-out by Bayer Pharmaceuticals, the ‘legacy’ of its toxic herbicide, Roundup®, literally has become a chemical scourge upon human health, plus the environment by poisoning soil, ground water, insect pollinators and producing other adverse effects yet to be discovered.

One unsuspecting place glyphosate, the main chemical active in Roundup®, has been scientifically found is in certain vaccines per the Anthony Samsel, PhD, and Stephanie Seneff, PhD, independent, conflict-of-interest-free research on page 15 of the report Vaccines and Glyphosate: A Toxic Combination.

One of the most dedicated, twenty-plus-years independent researcher to exposing the problems with Roundup® is Jeffrey Smith of the Institute for Responsible Responsibility. Jeffrey’s IRT recently produced a documentary about how changing from a standard American diet to an organic, glyphosate-free diet cured a family’s 21 different adverse health conditions, including Autism, which you can see below.

Secret Ingredients
A film by Jeffry Smith & Amy Hart

1:20:54


https://freeshowing.secretingredientsmovie.com/screening/watch/

If there is any relationship in the phrase “cause and effect,” this film should make consumers think how important it is to eat a clean, pesticide-, chemical-free diet to regain and also maintain optimum health, something your physician may not be aware about just yet!

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice, plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer health ​issues researcher ​and holistic health advocate since the late 1970s; she continues researching and writing in retirement. Her career in holistic healthcare began in the early 1970s when she had to save, and restructure, her life resulting from having “fallen through the allopathic medical paradigm cracks.”

Catherine has written numerous books. The following can be purchased on Amazon books:

Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities (2016)
Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines (2013)
A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments (2012)
Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009)
Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Subscribe to Natural Blaze for health freedom and natural living headlines to your inbox. Follow Natural Blaze on Twitter and Facebook.

Source

Shocking 3M Documents Reveal Company Hid the Dangers of Toxic Chemicals for Decades

By Emma Fiala

In a shocking resignation letter dated March 28, 1999, a 3M environmental specialist accused the company of being more concerned with profits and image than environmental safety.

According to Richard Purdy who penned the scathing letter, PFOS “is the most insidious pollutant since PCB” and is the cause for a potential health crisis across the entire country, but most notably in the state of Michigan. PFOS is used in 3M’s ScotchGard stain-protection product line and isn’t the only PFAS chemical the company uses.

“It is probably more damaging than PCB because it does not degrade, whereas PCB does; it is more toxic to wildlife,” the letter reads.

“I have worked within the system to learn more about this chemical and to make the company aware of the dangers associated with its continued use,” Purdy wrote. “But I have continually met roadblocks, delays, and indecision. For weeks on end, I have received assurances that my samples would be analyzed soon — never to see results. There are always excuses and little is accomplished.”

new report by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) and Northeastern University has found that people in 43 states in the United States are exposed to drinking water contaminated with PFAS chemicals, of which PFOS is one.

Michigan has been hit hardest, with at least 46 sites where groundwater has PFAS levels above the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) lifetime health advisory guideline. According to Detroit Free Press, “The Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy has estimated PFAS could be found at more than 11,300 sites in Michigan” including 17 bodies of water with “‘do not eat’ fish advisories, or limitations on consumption of fish, because of PFOS contamination.”

The revealing resignation letter was recently obtained by the Detroit Free Press along with numerous internal 3M documents. The documents were obtained by then-Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson during a 2010 lawsuit alleging environmental contamination by 3M in the state of Minnesota. The lawsuit was settled for $850 million in 2018.

While PFAS chemicals have proved useful in numerous applications including cleaning products, waterproof clothing, nonstick cookware, textiles, grease-resistant food packaging, leather, paper goods, paint and more, the very same properties that make it so successful in these applications is what makes it so harmful to environment. PFAS compounds are nearly indestructible, with some referring to them as “the forever chemicals.”

But the same qualities that made PFAS compounds so useful also makes them almost indestructible in the environment, giving them the ominous nickname “the forever chemicals.”

Documents show that 3M was, in fact, aware of PFAS toxicity in lab rats all the way back in 1950. In the mid-1970s, health concerns arose after studies of fish, rats, and monkeys. The problems were so prevalent, that the company became aware of rising levels of PFAS compounds in their employees’ blood along with a link to testicular cancer. PFAS compounds were “found to be completely resistant to biodegradation” way back in 1978.

PFAS, which have been linked to a host of medical conditions such as cancer, thyroid problems, hormone imbalances, pre-eclampsia, learning disabilities and more, are found in the blood of almost 99% of Americans.

Documents obtained during the 2010 lawsuit revealed, not only this shocking resignation letter, but documents outlining 3M’s research into PFAS compounds. It turns out, 3M has been well aware for years that the compounds do not break down in the environment as expected, that they were found in both the blood of employees and the public, and laboratory rats and other animals were experiencing negative health effects.

Despite the revelations, 3M continued to sell PFAS compounds used in a range of products including things that touch both human skin as well as food. The company also neglected to inform the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

However, in the 1990s, the EPA became increasingly aware of researching showing the presence of PFAS compounds in the environment and reached an agreement with 3M in 2000 to phase out the use of PFOS by 2003. While 3M stopped using PFOA in 2000, other companies—including DuPont, the company responsible for Teflon—continued their use until an agreement with the EPA to phase them out by 2015.

According to Purdy’s 1999 letter, the environmental specialist argued years before any action was taken that 3M had already “waited too long to tell customers about the widespread dispersal of PFOS in people and the environment.”

3M continues to make and sell these chemicals, though the company knows of an ecological risk assessment I did that indicates there is a better than 100% probability that perfluorooctansulfonate (PFOS) is biomagnifying in the food chain and harming sea mammals. This chemical is more stable than many rocks.

3M told those of us working on the fluorochemical project not to write down our thoughts or have email discussions on issues because of how our speculations could be viewed in a legal discovery process. This has stymied intellectual development on the issue, and stifled discussion on the serious ethical implications of decisions.

Now, almost 10 years after the 2010 lawsuit in Minnesota, a new one in Michigan is using the very same internal documents.

Both current and former residents of the small Midwest town of Parchment, Michigan are suing 3M and Georgia-Pacific over a toxic mess left in a landfill. PFAS compounds have leached from the landfill into the town’s water supply thanks to a paper mill responsible for manufacturing food safe paper coated with 3M’s product. As a result, thousands of current and former residents of the town were unknowingly exposed to high levels of the compound via municipal drinking water.

Nicholas Coulson, the Detroit environmental class-action attorney who is bringing the lawsuit against 3M said of the allegations against the company, “What we’re alleging that 3M did is really a crime against humanity.”

It’s an absolute outrage that, in the name of profit, for decades they suppressed this information, and they continued to pump these chemicals out in incredible quantities into the natural environment. And the terrible result of that is that some communities, like Parchment, have had to bear the brunt of it.

“3M had really, really sufficient notice to know that, one, these things don’t go away, they build up and build up and build up, both in the environment and the body, and two, that they cause really harmful effects,” Coulson added.

In his 1999 resignation letter, Richard Purdy concluded:

I have worked to the best of my ability within the system to see that the right actions are taken on behalf of the environment. At almost every step, I have been assured that action will be taken—yet I see slow or no results. I am told the company is concerned, but their actions speak to different concerns than mine. I can no longer participate in the process that 3M has established for the management of PFOS and precursors. For me it is unethical to be concerned with markets, legal defensibility and image over environmental safety.

Purdy wasn’t the only one to sound the alarm. The documents reveal that, dating back to the 1970s, numerous employees—including an employee named M.T. Case who author memos revealing toxicity, another who went by Dr. King, and Eric Reiner who worked in the company’s Environmental Engineering and Pollution Control division—urged the company to act on the research.

In a response to the Detroit Free Press, 3M seemingly bragged of their dedication to “research, technology, and clean-up” while calling the story gleaned from the internal documents “incomplete and misleading“:

3M has dedicated substantial time and resources to researching PFAS and, to that end, we have invested more than $600 million on research, technology, and clean-up efforts related to PFAS. As a responsible steward of our community, we have a record of sharing information we learn with government regulators, the scientific community, as well as local and federal officials.

The small set of documents from the Minnesota litigation portrays an incomplete and misleading story that distorts the full record regarding 3M’s actions with respect to PFOA and PFOS, as well as who we are as a company. 3M acted responsibly in connection with products containing PFAS and we will vigorously defend our environmental stewardship.

With 19 million people in 43 U.S. states currently exposed to drinking water contaminated with PFAS chemicals, the task of cleaning up these “forever chemicals” that are reportedly more stable than some rocks, is daunting. Companies like 3M that repeatedly prioritize profits and production of their products over people must be held accountable for the havoc wreaked on the environment, their customers, and their employees. While 3M did lose its $300 million/year revenue-maker ScotchGard after the 2000 agreement with the EPA, the loss only represented a mere 2% of 3M’s total sales. And while 3M bragged in their response to the Detroit Free Press of the $600 million spent on “research, technology, and clean-up efforts related to PFAS,” those amounts pale in comparison to the company’s profits, including the $7.9 billion earned in sales in the forth quarter of 2018 alone.

Time and time again, massive corporations that have caused harm—either knowingly or not—are tasked with clean-up costs or fines that barely make a dent in their bottomline. Without significant consequences for their actions, corporations like 3M will likely continue to prioritize profits over the health of the environment and even their customers. Perhaps the newest lawsuit against 3M will finally hold the company accountable to a degree that will impact the future.

This article was sourced from The Mind Unleashed.

Subscribe to Natural Blaze for health freedom and natural living headlines to your inbox. Follow Natural Blaze on Twitter and Facebook.

Source

Bayer Pharmaceuticals Taken Behind The Woodshed To The Tune Of $2Billion In Punitive Damages

By Catherine J. Frompovich

May 13, 2019 was not a very lucky day for Bayer Pharmaceuticals, the company that purchased Monsanto while also inheriting a backlog of lawsuits. The latest adjudications handed down by the court granting U.S.$1 BILLION in punitive damages to Alberta Pilliod and Alva Pilliod, each respectively, may include several unanticipated “collateral damage” consequences, the first of which could be Bayer’s demise. Hint: Think corporate karma.

Possibly, you may be wondering if Bayer is too big to fall; well think again. Stockholders inadvertently have ways of rearranging corporate structures. Can they afford the lawsuits? There’s close to a thousand lawsuits awaiting their day in court with Bayer.

Another possible by-product of the Pilliod lawsuits is chemical companies may become more science-conscious-struck in their research and decide not to fudge the real science when it proves chemicals are not consumer and user friendly. Who ever heard of “consensus science” before?

However, we also have to wonder what impacts there can and may be upon various “ABC” agencies in Washington, DC, that graciously approve health-destructive chemicals and products for consumer uses. “It’s safe to drink!” Remember that sales pitch.

Furthermore, can the above adjudications negatively impact how lobbyists, in particular, promote known health-damaging chemicals? Check out scientist Dr. Patrick Moore’s spiel in the video below.

1:39 minutes


https://youtu.be/fhES654s98Y?t=85

“Not really, I know it would not hurt me.” Dr. Moore, try telling that one to the Pilliods and the court that decided lawsuits in their favor. Of course, Bayer will appeal.

There’s an awful lot of incriminating evidence, which is found during the Discovery process in any lawsuit unless, of course, defendants use BleachBit disk cleaner software or take a hammer to the hard drive!

Personally, I’d like to see similar lawsuits filed against vaccine manufacturers in the USA, as Europeans now can do [1]. All chemical companies, which pharmaceutical makers actually are, i.e., legal drug suppliers, need to be held accountable at law for their products causing damage, e.g., opioids [2,3] and vaccines, plus contributing to the inordinate rise in U.S. healthcare costs.

U.S. health care spending grew 3.9 percent in 2017, reaching $3.5 trillion or $10,739 per person. As a share of the nation’s Gross Domestic Product, health spending accounted for 17.9 percent. [4] [CJF emphasis]

What needs to be mainstreamed is the U.S. CDC, FDA, HHS and Vaccine Court [United States Court of Federal Claims] ACTUALLY reports vaccine damage and pays compensation to a select lucky few. Check out this HRSA database. Pages 5, 8 and 9 ought to convince the mainstream media and all vaccine proponents that vaccines DO cause health harms.

That has to be addressed as the main reason for vaccine avoidances.

References:

[1] https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/06/26/science-wont-save-vaccines-from-lawsuits-anymore/
[2] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-opioids-litigation/u-s-state-lawsuits-against-purdue-pharma-over-opioid-epidemic-mount-idUSKCN1IG2WU
[3] https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Pennsylvania-AG-Opiod-Drugmaker-Lawsuit-509891921.html
[4] https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/statistics-trends-and-reports/nationalhealthexpenddata/nationalhealthaccountshistorical.html

Resources:

WHO, Pharma, Gates & Government: Who’s Calling the Shots? Jan. 27, 2019
https://www.nvic.org/nvic-vaccine-news/january-2019/who,-pharma,-gates.aspx

GMOs: What Do The Stars Say Astrologically? Aug. 3, 2013
https://www.activistpost.com/2013/08/gmos-what-do-stars-say-astrologically.html

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Subscribe to Natural Blaze for health freedom and natural living headlines to your inbox. Follow Natural Blaze on Twitter and Facebook.

Source

Big Pharma Exec Pushing Opioids Found Guilty of Racketeering

By Arjun Walia

In Brief

  • The Facts: The CEO Insys-Therapeutics and four other executives have been found guilty of racketeering with regards to opioid drugs. They falsified information and bribed many doctors, among other things.
  • Reflect On: When it comes to pharmaceutical products and our federal health regulatory agencies, along with pharmaceutical companies, there is no shortage of deceit and fraud. Why do we continue to trust and use their products?

The term “big pharma” is really making its rounds as more and more people become aware of the fact that the major corporations that manufacture the majority of our “medicine” are actually criminals. The latest example comes from a recent case where a federal jury found multiple top executives of Insys-Therapeutics, a well-known pharmaceutical company that sold a fentanyl-based painkiller (opioids), guilty of racketeering charges and contributing to America’s current opioid epidemic.

Racketeering is a crime committed through extortion or coercion. Intimidation and force are also associated with this charge, and it’s often linked with organized crime, which seems to be a fitting definition for our modern day medical industry. This corporate domination is exactly why, in 2014, the current Editor-in-Chief of The Lancet stated that “the case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.” (source) It’s why Arnold Symour Relman emphasized that the “medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research.” He thought it was  “disgraceful” that the academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry.” (source)

This isn’t a secret, but it’s quite odd how substances like opioids get approved by our federal health regulatory agencies, which have clearly been compromised as well.

In this case, the jury deliberated for two weeks before issuing a verdict against the company’s founder, John Kapoor, as well as four former executives of the company. They found that not only did these people conspire together on how to drive sales of their drug in several unethical ways, but they bribed doctors to prescribe their product and mislead insurers about patients’ needs for the drug as well.

According to the New York Times:

The verdict against Insys executives is a sign of the accelerating effort to hold pharmaceutical and drug distribution companies and their executives and owners accountable in ways commensurate with the devastation wrought by the prescription opioid crisis. More than 200,000 people have overdosed on such drugs in the past two decades. Federal authorities last month for the first time filed felony drug trafficking charges against a major pharmaceutical distributor, Rochester Drug Cooperative, and two former executives, accusing them of shipping tens of millions of oxycodone pills and fentanyl products to pharmacies that were distributing drugs illegally.

Shortly after Insys was given approval to sell their opioid drug, they found one very significant problem. Their drug, a sprayable form of fentanyl called Subsys, was designed to treat cancer patients with acute pain. However, they soon found that their market of cancer patients wasn’t quite big enough to match their profit goals, so they started falsifying information to make it look like patients had cancer so they could sell more of their drug.

The U.S. Department of Justice document reads:

Several pharmaceutical executives and managers, formerly employed by Insys Therapeutics, Inc., were arrested today on charges that they led a nationwide conspiracy to bribe medical practitioners to unnecessarily prescribe a fentanyl-based pain medication and defraud healthcare insurers.

Pretty wild, isn’t it?

This is great, but how deep does the deception go? How much power do these corporations and their executives hold? Below is a great quote from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that explains the issue quite well:

The pharmaceutical companies have been able to purchase congress. They’re the largest lobbying entity in Washington D.C.. They have more lobbyists in Washington D.C. than there are congressman and senators combined. They give twice to congress what the next largest lobbying entity is, which is oil and gas… Imagine the power they exercise over both republicans and democrats. They’ve captured them (our regulatory agencies) and turned them into sock puppets. They’ve compromised the press… and they destroy the publications that publish real science. (source)

We don’t really live in a democracy, we are living in a ‘corporatocracy.’ There are many products manufactured by pharmaceutical companies that are highly questionable in light of evidence like the example above. Take, for example, when pharmaceutical companies were not disclosing all information regarding the results of their drug trials. Researchers looked at documents from 70 different double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) and found that the full extent of serious harm in clinical study reports went undocumented.  (source)

Another great example comes from documents showing that pharmaceutical companies are deliberately concealing information for the sole purpose of getting us to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule. They show that British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years. The 45-page paper with detailed evidence can be downloaded here: The vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): are they at odds? by Lucija Tomljenovic, who was part of the Neural Dynamics Research Group, Dept. of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada at the time.

A few years ago, a group of more than a dozen scientists from within the CDC put out a public statement, while remaining anonymous, outlining the big problem of corporate influence and the effect it has on health policy decisions. The documents were referred to as the Spider Papers.  The authors really stressed just how big of a problem this is.

I could go on and on, but the bottom line is that fraud and corruption exist within many powerful pharmaceutical companies and within other major corporations that manufacture the products we use and consume.

This particular case with regards to opioids is a great step in the right direction, but we still have a long way to go.

Just as we would street-level drug dealers, we will hold pharmaceutical executives responsible for fueling the opioid epidemic by recklessly and illegally distributing these drugs, especially while conspiring to commit racketeering along the way,” said Andrew E. Lelling, the United States attorney in Massachusetts who pursued the case. (source)

But we still have to ask important questions, like why did the FDA just approve a painkiller 1,000 times stronger than morphine?

In the CE article ‘Study Reveals Big Pharma Paid Doctors Millions of Dollars To Push Opioids,’ Kalee Brown makes a cogent argument that the opioid epidemic, which is responsible for at least two thirds of the record 72,000 overdose deaths in the U. S. last year, is the product of a carefully crafted strategy that stems from a sinister alignment of  self-interest between Big Pharma, doctors, and the government. This strategy, it would seem, has no limits to its wickedness:

It’s no secret that Big Pharma is a money-making machine. Many even suggest that they design drugs with negative side effects so you remain sick, thus growing their market of sick consumers — a view supported by the reality that doctors get compensated for selling you drugs, not for getting you off of them.

Something to think about…

The Takeaway

Awareness on such issues is important. We live in an age where spreading information like the evidence shared in this article is incredibly difficult, as information is now heavily censored and blocked. Mainstream media controls the perception of the masses, and big pharma is one of multiple corporations who have been able to compromise them. At the end of the day, our ‘medicine’ makers can be corrupt, but there is a solution, and that’s us. There is no doubt about the fact that people are becoming more health conscious, more interested in alternative health, and more likely to seek out better ways to treat/medicate themselves instead of simply believing a doctor who only relies on pharmaceutical drugs without questioning them.

Arjun Walia — I joined the CE team in 2010 shortly after finishing university and have been grateful for the fact that I have been able to do this ever since 🙂 There are many things happening on the planet that don’t resonate with me, and I wanted to do what I could to play a role in creating change. It’s been great making changes in my own life and creating awareness and I look forward to more projects that move beyond awareness and into action and implementation. So stay tuned 🙂 [email protected]

This article was sourced from Collective Evolution.

Subscribe to Natural Blaze for health freedom and natural living headlines to your inbox. Follow Natural Blaze on Twitter and Facebook.

Source

Who Or What Produced The Anti-Vaccine Movement?

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Without a doubt, and unequivocally, the answer has to be Big Pharma with the unwavering help of the U.S. CDC and FDA, plus an assist from the U.S. military, which apparently subsidizes research for “weaponized” vaccines[1] – [2] – [3].

Why?

Perhaps this Forbes article, The Biopharmaceutical Industry Provides 75% Of The FDA’s Drug Review Budget. Is This A Problem?, may explain.

And, as would be expected, “user fees” have gone up over the years, from $208,000 per NDA in 1995 to a whopping $2,421,495 for fiscal year 2018.

How?

Big Pharma ‘researches’, manufactures, markets, including fraud with deceptive practices, in pushing “herd immunity” with patented neurotoxic and highly toxic excipients, which usually do not receive the same testing protocols OR time-sensitive trial studies as regular prescription pharmaceuticals, since vaccines are considered biologicals subject to a 75-cent TAX. What does the U.S. Treasury do with that tax? Read this.

How does FDA-hands-on-testing-malfeasance [Breach of Fiduciary Duty Law[4]?] exempt vaccines from proper safety studies, when almost every vaccine package insert boldly publishes the vaccine has not been tested to cause cancer, birth defects or interfere with human reproductive fertility. Is that safe? Actually, some of the vaccine’s ingredients can and do cause adverse health issues[5]. Please check Section 13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility on any vaccine package insert.

FDA states that

FDA tests and approves vaccines prior to release and shipment.

How can that be, when CDC/FDA further publish this:

Prelicensure: Vaccine Safety Testing | The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must license (approve) a vaccine before it can be used in the United States. FDA regulations for the development of vaccines ensure their safety, purity, potency, and effectiveness. Before a vaccine is approved by FDA for use by the public, results of studies on safety and effectiveness of the vaccine are evaluated by highly trained FDA scientists and doctors. FDA also inspects the vaccine manufacturing sites to make sure they comply with current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) regulations. Vaccine Development Vaccine development begins in the laboratory. [CJF emphasis]

Source: FDA

How can “Before a vaccine is approved by FDA for use by the public, results of studies on safety and effectiveness of the vaccine are evaluated by highly trained FDA scientists and doctors” be considered FDA tests and approves vaccines prior to release and shipment”? or is that another apparent deceptive practice from CDC/FDA?

If CDC/FDA really performed physical, actual hands-on tests, and not rely upon Big Pharma’s safety testing results—would Pharma tell anything adverse about their vaccines? Does the bear poop in the woods? Then there ought to be archived digital CDC/FDA-performed lab tests results that so called anti-vaxxers – or are they ex-vaxxers whose children experienced harms after vaccinations, can obtain by filing FOIA requests.

How about forming an Ex-Vaxxers FOIA Requests campaign?

Furthermore, shouldn’t there be congressional investigations into whether actual physical FDA testing occurs? Hasn’t Florida Congressman Bill Posey, since August of 2015, been requesting Congress to investigate vaccines based upon CDC whistleblower William Thompson’s factual story of how he participated in autism research fraud?

5:07 minutes



https://youtu.be/8UWPjUSo3_k?t=3

How much longer will healthcare consumers have to live with CDC/FDA obfuscations regarding actual vaccine safety and efficacy?

Why the anti-vaccine movement?

Because previously uninformed consumers, who avidly believed in vaccination ‘efficacy’, i.e., pro-vaxxers, dutifully had CDC/FDA mandated vaccines administered to their children who then suffered adverse health reactions ranging from mild to severe to death, including autism—now one in 59 kids in the USA, suddenly became ex-vaxxers NOT anti-vaxxers, as the common pejorative goes.

The REASON for the anti-vaccine movement

An unparalleled lack of empathy at federal, state and local health administration agencies about vaccine-caused-injury forced ex-vaxxers to tell their vaccine horror stories via the Internet and social media networks in order to educate and, hopefully, prevent other families from experiencing utter devastation when a child suddenly is no longer communicative, but has become sickly and burdensome financially to families.

In August 2012, I wrote the article

Guidelines to Autopsy Medical Tests: Parents Immediately Should Require an Autopsy That Includes Certain Tests because many parents and child caregivers were being charged with “Shaken Baby Syndrome” brought on by hospital medical staff alerting police to what they thought was excessive child abuse. However, the parent(s) knew the facts: No child abuse, but their child received a recent series of vaccines, which apparently precipitated severe encephalopathy[6] mimicking trauma. However, authorities filing SBS charges seems to have disappeared. I wonder why.

Why are questioning, refusing, plus any discussion about vaccine safety and efficacy, forbidden under penalty of law, or provoke police-state-like actions?

Every topic, no matter how bizarre, is not forbidden nor banned from public discourse or memes, but enthusiastically encouraged.

Transhumanism; gender-identify preferences; sexuality; pedophilia; leftist and socialist party geopolitical propaganda; civil rights; women’s rights; satanism, police brutality—you name it—are not subject to the jackboot treatment inadvertently stemming from obsolete 1905 vaccine case law, i.e., Jacobson v. Massachusetts[7] in the United States, which is “cherry picked” for certain enforcement provisions while not enforcing a $5 monetary fine and allowing the refuser to go free and not be vaccinated.

All the above groups, plus others, enjoy unfettered favorable time in multimedia venues, but ex-vaxxers and vaccine safety advocates are deprived their First Amendment rights. Blatant discrimination?

Australia has a gestapo-like vaccine policy; is the U.K. on its way there? Is the USA there now?

What is it about the politics of vaccinology that has the media’s, vaccine acolytes’, medical professions’ and Big Pharma’s britches so twisted? Could it be there may be too many vested-interest individuals who could be held legally at fault if only the truth were known about the real science often known only to the vaccine’s manufacturer?

Is Bayer-Monsanto’s Roundup® legal debacle of close to a thousand pending lawsuits something to replicate?

Resource:
CDC CASE STUDY: Death From Measles Vaccine Virus 15 Months After Vaccination
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/cdc-case-study-death-from-measles-vaccine-virus-15-months-after-vaccination

Notes:

[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447151/
[2] https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/106th-congress/house-report/556/1
[3] https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-regulatory-science/us-department-defense-and-fda-collaborate-help-speed-potential-countermeasures-ebola-and-other
[4] https://definitions.uslegal.com/b/breach-of-fiduciary-duty/
[5] https://vaers.hhs.gov/
[6] https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324008.php
[7] https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/197/11/

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available

Source

Eye-Opening Infographic Exposes The Harms of Fragrances in Personal Products

By Amanda Froelich

When you purchase hygienic products, such as deodorant or body spray, do you contemplate the safety of the ingredients? Probably not, because you, like millions of other people, assume that the company has your best interest in mind. While we wish this were true, it simply is not.

As Women’s Voices reports, it is legal for companies to keep fragrance ingredients a secret. In fact, the term “fragrance” can be a mix of up to 100 different chemicals, out of more than 3,000 commonly-used fragrance chemicals.

To make matters worse, many of those chemicals are linked to human and environmental harm. “Our report found that three out of four of the toxic chemicals in the beauty and personal care products we tested were fragrance chemicals,” said Connie Engel, Ph.D., BCPP Senior Manager of Science Translation. “And most of these toxic chemicals were not found on the product label.”

To educate the populace on the potential dangers of using products that contain fragrances, Women’s Voices created the following infographic. We think you’ll agree that it is incredibly eye-opening.

What are your thoughts? Please comment below and share this news!


Amanda Froelich — I’m an RHN, plant-based chef, freelance writer with 6+ years of experience, Reiki master therapist, world traveler and enthusiast of everything to do with animal rights, sustainability, cannabis and conscious living. I share healthy recipes at Bloom for Life and cannabis-infused treats at My Stoned Kitchen. Read More stories by Amanda Froelich

This article was sourced from Truth Theory.

Subscribe to Natural Blaze for health freedom and natural living headlines to your inbox. Follow Natural Blaze on Twitter and Facebook.

Source

“IF Truth Be Told About Vaccines” Anthology HHS-CDC-FDA Propagandize Big Pharma’s Pseudoscience Into Medical ‘Truths’

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Problem>>Reaction>>Solution

Problem

Medical science, based solidly in man-made-patented chemicals, is nothing short of a physiologically inept standard due to its “consensus science” being steeped in the dominant “disease management versus cure” modality using man-made chemicals—petrochemicals, in most cases, plus recently-added nanotechnology, something totally anathema to thousands of years of human (Homo Sapiens) biological evolution!

A rather significant clue to the allopathic paradigm’s healing failure [how long has there been a War on Cancer?] is its inability to factor into its consensus science, thinking and practices, there ARE cumulative effect(s) from all chemicals, including medicines and environmental, in the etiology of disease!

Source: The Truth About Vaccines

“You cannot poison a body into wellness.”

However, that’s not the apparent official position the FDA takes on the current pharmaceutical scourge and scandal coming out of China regarding contaminated blood pressure and heart medications.

The risk associated with abruptly discontinuing the use of these important medicines far outweighs the low risk that our scientists estimate to be associated with continuing the medicine until the patient’s doctor or pharmacist provides a safe replacement or a different treatment option,” the FDA stated.

If allopathic medicine were to acknowledge chemicals as a key precipitating factor – or trigger – in disease morphology, their entire house of cards would come tumbling down since its religious-belief-like educational system and protocols of Rx prescription drugs, chemotherapy, vaccines, biologicals—all man-made and patented were, and are based upon, a ‘monopolistic business plan’ designed by the late John D. Rockefeller (1839 – 1937)[1], whose main objective was to create a global pharmaceutical system of health controls for many reasons. Rockefeller’s prime objective was to eliminate natural medicine being practiced in the USA.

But there was one problem with Rockefeller’s plan for the medical industry: natural/herbal medicines were very popular in America at that time. Almost half the doctors and medical colleges in the U.S. were practicing holistic medicine, using knowledge from Europe and Native Americans.

Rockefeller, the monopolist, had to figure out a way to get rid of his biggest competition. So he used the classic strategy of “problem-reaction-solution.” That is, create a problem and scare people, and then offer a (pre-planned) solution.

This led to the Flexner Report, which gave birth to the modern medicine as we know it.[2]

Rockefeller probably factored into his monopolistic-plan, and thinking, the 1905 Supreme Court Case Jacobson v. Massachusetts[3] which set the standards for vaccination in the USA, and are totally obsolete today since back then in 1905 those who opposed vaccinations were fined only $5, BUT the ingredients (excipients) in vaccines then were ‘relatively harmless’ compared with the neurotoxins and nanoparticles present in today’s mandated vaccines! Thus, the courts must revisit Jacobson and bring it up to date: 1905 elementary immune system science versus 2019 consensus pseudoscience versus factual independent research science denied by vested-interest Big Pharma and CDC/FDA.

As they say, the rest is history. Furthermore, big medicine became the fair-hair child of Big Pharma, a corporate-controlled industry now directing medical schools, the U.S. HHS, CDC, FDA and CONGRESS, a man-made tragedy and criminal activity, in many educated opinions. The result: there’s been a voluminous and precipitous rise in iatrogenic diseases.

Iatrogenic (of a disease or symptoms) induced in a patient by the treatment or comments of a physician. Chambers English Dictionary[4]

Nothing demonstrates the above more clearly than the apparent ideological failure of vaccinology science, which has been delusional from the very beginning starting with Edward Jenner’s hypothesis. See If Truth Be Told About Cowpox & Smallpox Diseases Scientific Differences That Caused A Pharmaceutical Fairytale (March 25, 2019)

That delusion eventually morphed into a legal obstacle for humankind in many ways, i.e., depriving individuals of their right to self-determination in the care of their and their children’s health and bodies, which includes vaccination mandates, forced vaccinations, fines, and Child Protective Services abuses in removing children from parents’ custody and homes.

The fallacy of using aluminum in vaccines started around 1932.

Aluminum was first used in human vaccines in 1932 and was the only adjuvant in use in licensed vaccines for approximately 70 years. Apr 16, 2015[5]

Currently, there are newer adjuvants such as: AS04, MF59 squalene, AS01b, CpG 1018 a synthetic form of DNA.[6]

There’s a huge question about immunology
However, a huge question comes to mind when one considers immunology, a ‘science’ in its infancy days back then in the early 1930s.

When the humoral adaptive response to the aluminum adjuvant was discovered in the early 1900s, one has to wonder if that response was not a very real adverse reaction, since the humoral immune system was activated, not the innate immune system!

Had the rewiring the human immune system begun—inadvertently or intentionally, which enabled vaccine consensus science to plow forward creating the need for booster shots for all diseases. The information below may help you to understand why I make that claim.

The adaptive immune response is largely driven by lymphocytes: T-cells and B-cells. The relative activities of the B-cell and T-cell populations determine the type of immune response generated in response to infection.[7]

Real immunity [innate immunity] is life-long and occurs only after having contracted an infectious disease, which facilitates not having to live a life becoming either a carrier or a ‘progenitor’ of communicable infectious and other vaccine-laden diseases due to vaccine shedding for as long as 30 days post vaccination[8] and post vaccination booster shots!

How can “science-based medicine” be trusted when, in reality, low-level and insufficient populations ‘efficacy and safety’ studies were designed and implemented for a total of 800 children in only 8 remarkable studies to gain approval licensure for the MMR vaccine in 1978?

Furthermore, those studies do not include the ten-year [1990s] fraudulent fudging of efficacy reports for the Mumps active in the MMR vaccine when Merck added rabbit blood antibodies to achieve and meet the 95% efficacy rate required for FDA licensure. See the qui tam whistleblower lawsuit[9] in U.S. Federal Court in Philadelphia.

Thus, there is a specific need for this Anthology to drill down on the fraudulent erroneous propaganda HHS, CDC, FDA and Big Pharma have been promoting GLOBALLY for decades, influencing the World Health Organization (WHO) at the United Nations, foreign governments and local health agencies.

The Selling of Science” or the privatization of knowledge[10]
“The American public would be surprised, and maybe even concerned, if they knew how widespread the practice of self-regulation was.”
… José Solís, PhD

In a quote, which has become part of medical school orientations everywhere, David Sackett, often referred to as the “father of evidence-based medicine,” once famously said:

“Half of what you’ll learn in medical school will be shown to be either dead wrong or out of date within five years of your graduation; the trouble is that nobody can tell you which half–so the most important thing to learn is how to learn on your own.” [11]

—–

For a long time, we were interested by what we believe to be a pervasive problem in modern medicine. Namely, the spread of new technologies and therapies without clear evidence that they work, which are later (and often after considerable delay) followed by contradictions, which, in turn, after yet another delay, is followed by changes in practice and reimbursement.[12]
[CJF emphasis]
Sources: Killing For Profit – at the European Parliament

Resource:
The Fox Owns the Henhouse—When Public Safety is Governed by Private Profit [April 8, 2019]
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/the-fox-owns-the-henhouse-when-public-safety-is-governed-by-private-profit/

Reaction

The “reaction” within a normal Hegelian Dialectic ‘paradigm’[13] is not what’s been occurring in the case of vaccine fraud. Since the Autism explosion[14], there’s been an enlightenment, plus outrage, taking place due to the sharing of knowledge and personal child-and-family life-altering adverse health reaction stories by the thousands, including resolute consumer activism regarding First Amendment and humans’ unalienable rights, which health officials may not have expected.

Here’s one example:

Reality Check: Questioning Vaccines is a Public Health Threat? Ben Swann (March 14, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/reality-check-questioning-vaccines-is-a-public-health-threat.html

Others:

Attkisson Report Reveals Threats Against Congressmen Investigating Autism-Vaccine Link
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2019/01/attkisson-report-reveals-threats-against-congressmen-investigating-autism-vaccine-link/ (Jan. 9, 2019)

“We spoke to 11 current and former members of Congress and staff who claim they faced pressure, bullying or threats when they raised vaccine safety questions.” Physician and former Rep. Dave Weldon commented, “It would typically be in a hallway or the street and people would come up to you and say, “You know, you really need to, you know, back off on this. It could be, it could be bad for the community or bad for the country or bad for you.”

Congressman Mark Green Under Fire for Seeking Vaccine Truth [Jan. 1, 2019]
https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/mark-green-vaccine-truth/

There are 3 major issues here:

  1. That vaccines have not been proven safe
  2. That the research standards and liability for vaccine manufacturers are uniquely inadequate
  3. That we are currently in the midst of one of the greatest assaults on freedom and integrity in a generation.

Rep. Bill Posey Calling for an investigation of the CDC’s MMR research fraud [July 29, 2015]

[embedded content]

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4546421/rep-bill-posey-calling-investigation-cdcs-mmr-reasearch-fraud

The Making of a Monster: We’re All Lab Rats in the Government’s Secret Experiments [March 26, 2019]
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/the-making-of-a-monster-were-all-lab-rats-in-the-governments-secret-experiments.html

UPS partnering with drug giants to inject you with vaccines in your own home… pilot project a blueprint for nationwide vaccine mandates at gunpoint [April 5, 2019]
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-04-05-ups-drug-giants-inject-vaccines-home-blueprint-mandates.html

Solution

The only solution to this unprecedented medical police state now encompassing the vaccine fraud perpetrated upon U.S. citizens, plus others globally, is for there to be criminal investigations into the documented FRAUDULENT science manipulation that has taken place time after time at the very agencies entrusted with the safe-keeping of consumer health in the USA.

High-ranking federal HHS/CDC/FDA bureaucrats, researchers, epidemiologists, etc. who have perpetuated these ongoing fraudulent practices must be prosecuted legally at law and removed from their cozy perches of authority reflecting Big Pharma’s controls.

It’s what’s referred to as “breach of fiduciary duty”.

“A person acting in a fiduciary capacity is held to a high standard of honesty and full disclosure in regard to the client and must not obtain a personal benefit at the expense of the client.”

Source: USLegal.com

When Congress enacted the 1986 National Vaccine Law[15], was that a benign or deliberate betrayal of U.S. health consumers, equivalent to ‘throwing them under the bus’, which can be considered criminal and collusive activity, plus a breach of fiduciary duty?

Did Congress essentially absolve vaccine manufacturers from any and all product legal liability claims, thus ensuring Congressional constituents that Congress, figuratively, had “thrown voters under the bus”?

That idiomatic phrase, “thrown under the bus,” represents a veiled spirit of sordid betrayal, plus intended, undeniable deliberate harms, since Congress knew about the tremendous number of lawsuits for vaccine product adverse reactions that prompted Big Pharma to seek Congressional “get out of jail free” cards, or not make vaccines. Was that an illegal act by Big Pharma? Collusion? Sherman Antitrust Act and RICO?

According to the 1986 NCVIA, it preempts all design-defect claims against vaccines as unavoidably unsafe, and was affirmed per the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2011 Brusewitz decision.

In essence, the U.S. Congress sacrificed infants, toddlers, teens, adults and seniors unalienable health rights and personal sovereignty to the ‘arm bending’ and ‘no vaccines manufactured threats’ made by vaccine makers, who, at that time, were subject to “a storm of lawsuits,” more than Big Pharma could defend and probably would have put them out of business! Fast forward to what’s happening with Bayer after purchasing Monsanto and the thousands of glyphosate lawsuits.

That lawsuits admission, alone, should have been THE huge red flag something was wrong with vaccines and for Congress to say, “Hell, no! Clean up your act!”

Thus we can see how Congress knowingly colluded with Big Pharma to ensure denial of product liability legal rights to citizens damaged by vaccine. That NCVIA law gave Big Pharma and the CDC/FDA what amounts to “carte blanche” [complete freedom to act as one wishes or thinks best][16] for the roughshod and draconian vaccination mandates since 1989, ever increasing to today’s nightmares!

Needless to say, “all hell’s broken lose” and there’s more fraudulent disinformation about vaccine ‘science’ than probably at any time in history, since the CDC/FDA literally have become the Big Pharma vaccine machine ‘mouthpiece’.

The indignities, harms, adverse reactions and police state activities involving vaccine issues must be addressed immediately. Therefore, here’s a suggestion to be taken seriously by all who care about what’s happening regarding the “Vaccine Police State” wherever you live.

What to do.

Contact the following law authorities and request a Breach of Fiduciary Responsibility be filed against Big Pharma, vaccine manufacturers and Congress.

The Attorney General of the United States
All Attorneys General[17] of each of the 50 U.S. states
All Inspectors General[18] of every health agency at federal and state levels

While you are at it, kindly remind all officials that the Sherman Antitrust Act[19] and the RICO Act[20] [18 U.S. Code CHAPTER 96—RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS] also are involved.

All The Proof You Need to File Your Requests

Below is a series of “If Truth Be Told” articles published online containing factual science documentation for you to present to authorities, which prove FRAUD regarding vaccine science being a perpetual practice within CDC and FDA.

Are There “Sleeper” VACCINE-caused Mutations Cytochrome P450 Genes Produce Which Medicine Deliberately Ignores (March 4, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/are-there-sleeper-vaccine-caused-mutations-cytochrome-p450-genes-produce-which-medicine-deliberately-ignores.html

If Truth Be Known About The Mumps Vaccine! Animal Blood Antibodies For 10 Years Got FDA Licensure: FRAUD (March 14, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/if-truth-be-known-about-the-mumps-vaccine-animal-blood-antibodies-for-10-years-got-fda-licensure-fraud.html

IF Truth Be Told About Vaccines! Risk Of Seizures After MMR & DTP Vaccinations Exist Per CDC Vaccine Safety Datalink Working Group (March 16, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/if-truth-be-told-about-vaccines-risk-of-seizures-after-mmr-dtp-vaccinations-exist-per-cdc-vaccine-safety-datalink-working-group.html

If Truth Be Told About Fake News, Trolls & “Astroturfing” (March 20, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/if-truth-be-told-about-fake-news-trolls-astroturfing.html

If Truth Be Told About Cowpox & Smallpox Diseases Scientific Differences That Caused A Pharmaceutical Fairytale (March 25, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/if-truth-be-told-about-cowpox-smallpox-diseases-scientific-differences-that-caused-a-pharmaceutical-fairytale.html

If Truth Be Told About The SV-40 Cancer Virus In The Original Polio Vaccines Given To Millions Of American Children (March 27, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/if-truth-be-told-about-the-sv-40-cancer-virus-in-the-original-polio-vaccines-given-to-millions-of-american-children.html

If Truth Be Told About Unreported Vaccine Adverse Reactions: Do VAERS Reports Represent Demographic Statistical Actuality? (March 31, 2019)
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/03/if-truth-be-told-about-unreported-vaccine-adverse-reactions-do-vaers-reports-represent-demographic-statistical-actuality.html

If Truth Be Told: Pregnancy Vaccines Are Not Tested For Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment Of Fertility Proof In Vaccine Package Inserts [April 4, 2019]
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/04/if-truth-be-told-pregnancy-vaccines-are-not-tested-for-carcinogenesis-mutagenesis-impairment-of-fertility-proof-in-vaccine-package-inserts.html

If Truth Be Told About Death, Disability Vaccines Ineffectiveness With Validation From Peer Review Journals, Demographic Charts & Graphs [April6, 2019]
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/04/if-truth-be-told-about-death-disability-vaccines-ineffectiveness-with-validation-from-peer-review-journals-demographic-charts-graphs.html

If Truth Be Told About Measles Deaths In U.S. 2004 to 2015 [April 7, 2019]
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/04/if-truth-be-told-about-measles-deaths-in-u-s-2004-to-2015.html

MMR Vaccine Approved After Only 42-Day-Trials In 1978, Per FDA FOIA Reports [April 13, 2019]
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/04/mmr-vaccine-approved-after-only-42-day-trials-in-1978-per-fda-foia-reports.html

If Truth Be Told About CDC’s Science Manipulators [April 15, 2019]
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/04/if-truth-be-told-about-cdcs-science-manipulators.html

The Pièce de résistance In Vaccine Data

Nothing addresses the documented “numbers game” in vaccine statistics reporting than the two sets of seemingly opposing data below which ought to demonstrate clearly how vaccine data reporting is skewed and cannot be depended upon for accuracy.

Measles U.S. Cases Chart 1950 to 2019
https://www.statista.com/statistics/186678/new-cases-of-measles-in-the-us-since-1950/

1950 319,124
1960 441,783
1970 47,351
1980 13,506
1990 27,786
1991 9,643
1992 2,237
2018 372
2019 555

Now, compare the above figures with the numbers from CDC: is the average numbers game being played?, or so it seems. Who can prove such statistics?

Which data sets represent fraudulent statistics?

CDC’s report most quoted on measles stats
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00056803.htm

Measles.

Measles vaccine was licensed in the United States in 1963. During 1958-1962, an average of 503,282 measles cases and 432 measles-associated deaths were reported each year (9-11). Measles incidence and deaths began to decline in 1965 and continued a 33-year downward trend. This trend was interrupted by epidemics in 1970-1972, 1976-1978, and 1989-1991. In 1998, measles reached a provisional record low number of 89 cases with no measles-associated deaths (13). All cases in 1998 were either documented to be associated with international importations (69 cases) or believed to be associated with international importations (CDC, unpublished data, 1998). In 1994, every dollar spent to purchase measles-containing vaccine saved $10.30 in direct medical costs and $3.20 in indirect societal costs (7)

7. Batelle Medical Technology Assessment and Policy Reserach Program, Centers for Public Health Research and Evaluation. A cost benefit analysis of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine. Arlington, Virginia: Batelle, 1994
9. CDC. Annual summary 1980: reported morbidity and mortality in the United States. MMWR 1981;29.
10. CDC. Reported incidence of notifiable diseases in the United States, 1960. MMWR 1961;9.
11. CDC. Reported morbidity and mortality in the United States, 1970. MMWR 1971;19.

Lastly, what’s happening in the country of Ukraine where, as of April 3, 2019, there were close to 70,000 cases of measles?

Are children dropping over like flies? How come there seems to be ‘a lid’ on reporting what’s going on regarding a dramatic spread of measles in the European Union? What role do refugees and immigrants from elsewhere play in the spread of infectious diseases[21] anywhere?

Concerned healthcare consumers must recognize what’s become the “tail wagging the dog”: Big Pharma vaccine geopolitics.

Notes:

[1] https://worldaffairs.blog/2015/10/20/how-rockefeller-founded-modern-medicine-and-killed-natural-cures/
[2] Ibid.
[3] https://www.nvic.org/nvic-vaccine-news/november-2016/forced-vaccination-the-tragic-legacy.aspx
[4] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923397/
[5] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494348/
[6] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/adjuvants.html
[7] Ibid.
[8] https://www.nvic.org/cmstemplates/nvic/pdf/live-virus-vaccines-and-vaccine-shedding.pdf
[9] https://bergermontague.com/federal-judge-permits-false-claims-act-case-continue-vaccine-manufacturer-merck/
[10] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/the-fox-owns-the-henhouse-when-public-safety-is-governed-by-private-profit/?utm_source=mailchimp
[11] https://retractionwatch.com/2011/07/11/so-how-often-does-medical-consensus-turn-out-to-be-wrong/
[12] Ibid. study co-author Vinay Prasad
[13] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic
[14] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/?fbclid=IwAR0SKjwd6BTSFxPdnzQFok4ki0ofTE8AZvPuzZj6I311RGfwMwhZa2wm6z4#!po=26.9444https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546
[15] https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546
[16] Dictionary online
[17] https://legcounsel.house.gov/Comps/Inspector%20General%20Act%20Of%201978.pdf
[18] Ibid.
[19] https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/sherman_antitrust_act
[20] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-96
[21] https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html

Top image credit: Infowars

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Source